Model Year | 2016 | 2017 | |
Model | Toyota Prius | Toyota Land Cruiser V8 | |
Engine | 1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 95 hp@5200 105 lb-ft@3600 |
5.7L V8 DOHC-4v 381 hp@5600 401 lb-ft@3600 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD w/low range | |
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,539 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,760 mm | 1,979 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,476 mm | 1,880 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,395 kg | 2,638 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 93 L | -50 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,090 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 988 mm | -38 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,552 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 874 mm | -26 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 909 mm | -909 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,582 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,438 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 719 mm | -719 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,682 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 697 L | 456 L | 241 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.6 | 1,218 L | 23.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,775 L | 2,313 L | -1 L |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser V8.