| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Toyota RAV4 and 2012 Lincoln MKZ Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Lincoln MKZ | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@6200 334 Nm@4700 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 196 kW@6250 338 Nm@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,728 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,841 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,658 kg | 1,725 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 66 L | -6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 960 mm | -959 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 942 mm | 31 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 467 L | -119 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 16.5 | -15.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 16.5 | -14.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Toyota RAV4
| 2007 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
lots of leg room. very comfortable for 2 people see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Seat fits. Bottom long enough to support legs. Molded to body style. Not flat and short. Noticeably better feel to seat than any other vehicle. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Excellent rear seat room with sliding rear seat. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Plenty of space to stretch out in, and has sliding seats to adjust the legroom or rear cargo capactity. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Leg room is confortable for large people, not croweded see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2007 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Seat is power but doesnt go back far enough for me 6ft.bottom seat coushion litte short. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Tight fit for tall people in front - length and width. No worse than Forester, but not any better. 2nd row is _very_ spacious, and slides forward/backward. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Needs a little more front seat travel see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Not quite enough steering wheel room. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Has less legroom for second seat passengers compared to CR-V. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Interior seems a little more cramped than competing models. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review | |
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
