Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota Sequoia | Tesla Model S | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,000 mm | 2,959 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,179 mm | 4,978 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,004 mm | 1,963 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,869 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,309 kg | 2,108 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 100 L | 0 L | 100 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,577 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,516 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,031 mm | 897 mm | -896 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,580 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,481 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 899 mm | 84 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 935 mm | 0 mm | 935 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,547 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,278 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 757 mm | 0 mm | 757 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 753 L | 895 L | -142 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,849 L | 31.6 | -30.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,627 L | 1,795 L | 2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Toyota Sequoia.
2013 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Tesla Model S.