| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Toyota Verso-S and 2016 Chrysler 200 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Verso-S | Chrysler 200 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Verso-S
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Verso-S.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
| 2016 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
