| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota Yaris and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Yaris | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,461 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 3,825 mm | 5,182 mm | -2 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,061 kg | 2,479 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 42 L | 98 L | -56 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,087 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,306 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,270 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 983 mm | -20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,280 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,186 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 859 mm | 991 mm | -132 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,882 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 263 L | 433 L | -170 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 9.3 | 1,461 L | 8.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 728 L | 2,682 L | 726 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Yaris
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Toyota Yaris.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
