| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Volkswagen Routan and 2014 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Model | Volkswagen Routan | Volkswagen Golf / GTI | |
| Engine | 4.0L V6 OHC-4v 251 hp@6000 259 lb-ft@4200 |
2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 170 hp@5700 177 lb-ft@4250 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,078 mm | 2,578 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,144 mm | 4,201 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,953 mm | 1,786 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,750 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,096 kg | 1,372 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 78 L | 55 L | 23 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,600 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 978 mm | 18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,643 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 902 mm | 20 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,575 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 808 mm | 0 mm | 808 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,761 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 915 L | 425 L | 490 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,350 L | 15.0 | -13 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,993 L | 1,303 L | 2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Volkswagen Routan
| 2010 Volkswagen Routan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 251-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
we have the higher line SEL with Nappa leather seats, just the right amount of padding and thigh support for long trips see full Volkswagen Routan review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
| 2014 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The original Golf revolutionized the automotive world by demonstrating how practical a small car could be. Though the latest, seventh-generation Golf is much larger than the original, and every major auto maker now offers a Golf-like compact, the Volkswagen continues to impress with its practicality. Let's start with the front seat. The seat itself is shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The performance buckets in the GTI and R have firmer bolsters that provide more lateral support, but the regular Golf's buckets are cushier and more comfortably contoured. The e-Golf uses the same exemplary seats. In comparison, the seats in the Soul EV are merely okay. The view forward from the e-Golf's driver seat is also about as good as it gets in a current compact, with a reasonably-sized instrument panel and an expansive, comfortably raked windshield flanked by relatively thin pillars. This said, some people might prefer the higher driving position in the quasi-crossover Soul EV. For me, a conventional car's lower position continues to feel more natural, especially in turns. Battery packs take up space. Even with the (roughly) 1.5-kWh battery packs used by hybrids cargo capacity usually takes a hit. In the Soul EV, rear seat legroom suffers a three-inch reduction due to the underfloor location of the car's 27-kWh battery pack. But VW engineers managed to design and package a 24-kWh battery pack so cleverly that the e-Golf's passenger and cargo room are identical to those of a regular Golf. Adults will comfortably fit in the car's back seat. The same can't be said about most other EVs--the Soul being a second exception. Even with the three-inch cut, the Kia's back seat is about as roomy as the Golf's. The i3's back seat is far tighter. Which EV treats its passengers best depends on the season. The e-Golf includes rear air vents, while the Soul EV+ includes rear seat bun warmers. Moving to the cargo area, the Soul EV's battery pack eats up a dozen cubic feet, leaving just under 50. The uncompromised e-Golf can contain a couple more. But these figures don't convey the differing proportions of the cars' cargo holds. The e-Golf's is a few inches longer, while the Soul EV's is a few inches taller. Which is the better cargo hauler depends on the shape of your cargo. The much larger Tesla Model S can hold a few more cubic feet, the Mercedes-Benz B-Class about the same as the e-Golf. No other EV comes close, especially not the 12-cube BMW i3. see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Volkswagen Golf / GTI.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models.
