| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2022 Volvo C40 and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2022 | 2011 | |
| Model | Volvo C40 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,703 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,440 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,910 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,590 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,185 kg | 1,964 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 0 L | 76 L | -76 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,435 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 932 mm | 991 mm | -59 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,422 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 917 mm | 1,011 mm | 916 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,956 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 433 L | 487 L | -54 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.3 | 1,368 L | 14.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,388 L | 2,852 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2022 Volvo C40
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Volvo C40.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
