| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Volvo C70 and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 | |
| Model | Volvo C70 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 227 hp@5000 236 lb-ft@1500 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,639 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,582 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,836 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,400 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,740 kg | 1,616 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 56 L | 4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 970 mm | 1,008 mm | 969 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 991 mm | -66 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,194 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,054 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 861 mm | 1,006 mm | 860 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 362 L | 875 L | -513 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.8 | 1,688 L | 11.8 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volvo C70
| 2013 Volvo C70 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Great front seats, very comfortable. Minimal wind buffeting with the top down. Volvo offered an accessory wind blocker with this model but it's not necessary. Interior trim on the arm rests could be softer. My elbow gets sore resting on the hard plastic. I keep a small fleece pad in the car to solve this little issue. see full Volvo C70 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
