| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Volvo S60 and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Volvo S60 | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 116.0 in | -6.7 in |
| Length | 182.2 in | 204.0 in | -21.8 in |
| Width | 73.4 in | 80.5 in | -7.1 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 74.4 in | -16 in |
| Curb Weight | 3548 lb. | 5466 lb. | -1918 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.8 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -8.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.3 in | 42.8 in | -4.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 64.8 in | -7.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 60.8 in | -5.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 45.3 in | -3.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 38.7 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.2 in | 65.1 in | -9.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.5 in | 60.3 in | -6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 39.0 in | -5.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -33.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -3.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.0 | 51.6 ft3 | -39.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -82.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volvo S60
| 2013 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The driver's seat and driver's position are outstanding, the best I've ever experienced and I've driven Lexuses and Infinitis. Passenger's seat is also very comfortable.rnrnCaution: Back seat and trunk are small. Also, no spare. You get an inflation kit. You can pay $250 for a donut spare. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Volvo has a reputation for quality seating - I am very pleased with the comfort and support. I had a recent trip of about 14 hours, and the seats provided the best comfort I've had compared to all other cars I've owned and have drove in long distance trips. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very comfortable driving position. Visibility is outstanding in all quarters. I've taken this car on frequent road trips (>300 miles) and I've been very comfortable throughout the trip. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2013 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very tight in back. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat space is smaller than 3-series BMW. It's fine for children/young adults, but full size people will find it a little tight. Volvo should have added about six inches to the length and a few inches in width. see full Volvo S60 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
