| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Volvo S60 and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
| Model | Volvo S60 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5600 325 lb-ft@2100 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 104.8 in | 4.5 in |
| Length | 182.2 in | 171.5 in | 10.7 in |
| Width | 73.4 in | 77.4 in | -4 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 64.4 in | -6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3901 lb. | 3680 lb. | 221 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.8 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -0.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.3 in | 40.3 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 56.6 in | 0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 0.0 in | 54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 43.1 in | -1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 39.7 in | -2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.2 in | 55.4 in | -0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.5 in | 0.0 in | 53.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 35.7 in | -2.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -3.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -8.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | -39 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo S60
| 2011 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very comfortable driving position. Visibility is outstanding in all quarters. I've taken this car on frequent road trips (>300 miles) and I've been very comfortable throughout the trip. see full Volvo S60 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
