| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Volvo S60 and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
| Model | Volvo S60 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,577 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,814 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,427 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,539 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 76 L | -8 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,006 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,427 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,245 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 991 mm | -28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 846 mm | 1,011 mm | 845 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,928 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 394 L | 487 L | -93 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.9 | 1,368 L | 12.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.9 | 2,852 L | 11.9 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Volvo S60
| 2006 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 177hp 2.0L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
one word? SUPER. one time drove 15 hours, couple of rest stops, futher nothing the mather. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2006 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 208hp 2.5L I5 5-speed automatic FWD |
Not enough rear seat legroom for a car in this class. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 208hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Minimal rear seat leg room. Our kids are 9 & 8 - we are having to look for a replacement car as they are getting too big for this one. To offset the front seats are as comfortable as I have experienced in a car. Now considering an S80 or XC70. see full Volvo S60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
