| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Volvo S60 and 2014 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Volvo S60 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,628 mm | 5,095 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,864 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,483 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,769 kg | 1,958 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 67 L | 76 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 1,006 mm | 972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 991 mm | -41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,359 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,011 mm | 850 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,915 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 340 L | 487 L | -147 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.0 | 1,368 L | 11 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 | 2,852 L | 10 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo S60
| 2011 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very comfortable driving position. Visibility is outstanding in all quarters. I've taken this car on frequent road trips (>300 miles) and I've been very comfortable throughout the trip. see full Volvo S60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mazda CX-9
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mazda CX-9.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
