Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
Model | Volvo S80 | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,791 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,849 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,831 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,453 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,622 kg | 1,196 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 40 L | 40 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 937 mm | 51 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 0 mm | 955 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,412 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 408 L | 711 L | -303 L |
2006 Volvo S80 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Excellent lumbar support and almost infinate power adjustments help my probelms with episodic low back pain. see full Volvo S80 review |
2007 | 4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The front seats are like sitting in a lazy boy. So comfortable on long trips and just a dream to drive. see full Volvo S80 review |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |