Model Year | 2016 | 2020 | |
Model | Volvo S80 | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 179 kW@5600 350 Nm@1500 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 434 Nm@2500 |
|
Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,835 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,851 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,862 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,494 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,608 kg | 1,735 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 56 L | 14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,008 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,458 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 991 mm | -18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 889 mm | 1,006 mm | 888 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 875 L | -453 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.9 | 1,688 L | 13.9 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo S80.
2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.