| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Volvo V60 and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
| Model | Volvo V60 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,636 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,864 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,483 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,665 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 67 L | 76 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,006 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 991 mm | -41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,359 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,011 mm | 850 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,915 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 430 L | 487 L | -57 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.2 | 1,368 L | 14.2 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,240 L | 2,852 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Volvo V60.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
