Volvo XC60 (2011) vs. Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo (2004) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2011 Volvo XC60 and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo specs.
2011 Volvo XC60 and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Specifications
Model Year |
2011 |
2004 |
|
Model |
Volvo XC60 |
Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo XC60
2012 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
They are firm enough & well shaped to be comfortable over the long trip + also comfortable when you first sit in them
see full Volvo XC60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
2005 |
4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Volvo models.