Volvo XC60 (2016) vs. Mazda CX-5 (2020) Specs

vs.

◆

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2020 Mazda CX-5 Specifications

Model Year	2016	2020
Model	Volvo XC60	Mazda CX-5
Engine	turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5600 325 lb-ft@2100	turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,774 mm	2,697 mm	0 mm
Length	4,643 mm	4,549 mm	0 mm
Width	1,890 mm	1,842 mm	0 mm
Height	1,712 mm	1,659 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,940 kg	1,735 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	70 L	56 L	14 L
Headroom, Row 1	993 mm	1,008 mm	992 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,440 mm	1,450 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,377 mm	1,402 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,046 mm	1,041 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	1,003 mm	991 mm	-990 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,402 mm	1,392 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,367 mm	1,405 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	925 mm	1,006 mm	924 mm
Total Legroom	1,971 mm (over 2 rows)	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	-1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	872 L	875 L	-3 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	1,909 L	1,688 L	0 L

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo XC60.

2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.