| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Volvo XC60 and 2016 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Volvo XC60 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,774 mm | 2,929 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,628 mm | 5,065 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,890 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,712 mm | 1,753 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,820 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 72 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 965 mm | 998 mm | -33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,377 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 978 mm | -10 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,367 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 1,001 mm | 924 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 754 mm | -754 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 872 L | 408 L | 464 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.8 | 1,082 L | 29.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,909 L | 2,016 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volvo XC60
| 2012 Volvo XC60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
They are firm enough & well shaped to be comfortable over the long trip + also comfortable when you first sit in them see full Volvo XC60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-9
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-9.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
