Volvo XC70 (2006) vs. Mazda CX-5 (2020) Specs

vs.

◆

2006 Volvo XC70 and 2020 Mazda CX-5 Specifications

Model Year	2006	2020
Model	Volvo XC70	Mazda CX-5
Engine	turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 208 hp@5000 236 lb-ft@1500	turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500
Transmission	5-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr Wagon	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,764 mm	2,697 mm	0 mm
Length	4,732 mm	4,549 mm	0 mm
Width	1,859 mm	1,842 mm	0 mm
Height	1,562 mm	1,659 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,664 kg	1,735 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	68 L	56 L	12 L
Headroom, Row 1	998 mm	1,008 mm	997 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,427 mm	1,450 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,397 mm	1,402 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,082 mm	1,041 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	988 mm	991 mm	-3 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,420 mm	1,392 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,392 mm	1,405 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	894 mm	1,006 mm	893 mm
Total Legroom	1,976 mm (over 2 rows)	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	-1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	1,059 L	875 L	-874 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	2,022 L	1,688 L	1 L

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Volvo XC70.

2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons

See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.