Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
Model | Volvo XC90 | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | 3.2L I6 DOHC-4v 240 hp@6200 236 lb-ft@3200 |
1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 122 hp@6000 123 lb-ft@1000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,860 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,798 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,897 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,783 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,061 kg | 1,220 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 40 L | 40 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,481 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 0 mm | 975 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,458 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 0 mm | 879 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 902 mm | 0 mm | 902 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 765 mm | 0 mm | 765 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,685 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 249 L | 711 L | -462 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,226 L | 25.1 | -24.1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,410 L | 25.1 | -23.1 L |
2012 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
In an effort to make room for the third seat, the leg room up front has been compromised see full Volvo XC90 review |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |