| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Volvo XC90 and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Model | Volvo XC90 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | 3.2L I6 DOHC-4v 240 hp@6200 236 lb-ft@3200 |
1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,860 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,798 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,783 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,061 kg | 1,169 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 40 L | 40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,481 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 991 mm | -16 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,458 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 876 mm | 3 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 902 mm | 0 mm | 902 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 765 mm | 0 mm | 765 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,685 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 249 L | 583 L | -334 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,226 L | 20.6 | -19.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,410 L | 1,623 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volvo XC90
| 2012 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
In an effort to make room for the third seat, the leg room up front has been compromised see full Volvo XC90 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
