| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2022 Volvo XC90 and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2022 | 2013 | |
| Model | Volvo XC90 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,985 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,948 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 2,009 mm | 1,694 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,990 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 40 L | 31 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 1,026 mm | 987 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,308 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 991 mm | -13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,303 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 876 mm | 64 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 902 mm | 0 mm | 902 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 810 mm | 0 mm | 810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,789 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 447 L | 583 L | -136 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,184 L | 20.6 | -19.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,427 L | 1,623 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2022 Volvo XC90
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Volvo XC90.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
