Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
Model | Volvo XC90 | Nissan Murano | |
Engine | 4.4L V8 DOHC-4v 311 hp@5850 325 lb-ft@3900 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.6 in | 111.2 in | 1.4 in |
Length | 188.9 in | 192.8 in | -3.9 in |
Width | 74.7 in | 75.4 in | -0.7 in |
Height | 70.2 in | 66.6 in | 3.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4612 lb. | 3920 lb. | 692 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 21.1 gal. | 19.0 gal. | 2.1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 39.9 in | -0.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 59.6 in | -1.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 54.8 in | 0.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 43.6 in | -2.6 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 39.8 in | -1.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.4 in | 58.8 in | -1.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 55.2 in | -1.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 38.7 in | -4.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 35.5 in | 0.0 in | 35.5 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 30.1 in | 0.0 in | 30.1 in |
Total Legroom | 105.7 in (over 3 rows) | 82.3 in (over 2 rows) | 23.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.8 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 | -30.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 43.3 ft3 | 39.6 | 3.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 85.1 ft3 | 69.9 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 |
2006 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
7 passenger capacity. see full Volvo XC90 review |
2005 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 268hp 2.9L I6 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front leather seating is very comfortable. Having the heated front seats in twe winter allows for quick comfort. The multi adjustable seating for both driver and passenger allows for each to set seats to their liking then set in the memory location see full Volvo XC90 review |
2015 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Murano.