Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2017 Audi Q7 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Cargo capacity similarly falls short of expectations for a vehicle with the Q7's footprint and chunky profile, though not to as large a degree. While there's considerably more room behind the third row than in the original Q7, 15 vs. 11 cubic feet, as in nearly every other three-row crossover... Comparison vehicle: 2016 Volvo XC90 |
|
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL350 BlueTEC Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh You'll also find considerably more space for cargo inside the Mercedes-Benz GL-Class than inside the Audi. While 16 cubic feet behind the third row this still isn't enough for a road-tripping family, it's more than the 11 cubic feet behind the third row in the Q7. (To be fair, most... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Audi Q7 |
|
2008 Audi Q7 Pros and Cons Member2108 |