Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
9 comments |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh For a vehicle of its size and weight, the Range Rover Sport can't hold much cargo, with a maximum of 62 cubic feet. A Honda CR-V, though much smaller and lighter, can hold over 70 cubic feet. Blame the RRS's high load floor (a huge full size spare, part of... Comparison vehicle: 2014 BMW X5 |
3 comments |
2014 BMW X5 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Sophisticated, performance-oriented rear suspensions and abundant ground clearance compromise the cargo volume in both vehicles. Many smaller, less expensive crossovers can carry more of your stuff. This said, the X5's redesign added a few cubic feet, giving it an edge over the Range Rover Sport, 66 to 62.... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport |
Doc in Missouri 2011 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member2520 This is not a tall vehicle. Do not expect to fill this as you would a Tahoe. Seats almost fold flat. 5000lbs towing is ok, but not as good as Mercedes or Porsche. The towing package is a dealer installed option and costs about $1200 total, includeing a software reprogram... |
|
2006 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member5416 The cargo room isn't any better than that of most compact hatchbacks, and the sloping lid with tall load floor means that it's hard to fit taller items. The towing capacity is high, but I don't use my X5 to tow |
|
2011 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member5407 The trailer hitch is a $2000 plus option. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2002 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member2272 Space behind the rear seat could be a little larger. |
|
2002 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member2704 Cargo area not as large as the ML. |
|
2002 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member2326 Need a vehicle with greater capacity than a sedan. |