

Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
9 comments |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh I'll end with a final surprise: fuel economy no longer ranks among the reasons not to buy a Range Rover Sport. Thanks to a lower curb weight, a more efficient engine, and two more gears in the transmission (for a total of eight), the Range Rover Sport's EPA ratings jump... Comparison vehicle: 2014 BMW X5 |
3 comments |
2014 BMW X5 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh With either of the six-cylinder engines, fuel economy would be among the reasons to buy an X5. Even with the V8 real-world fuel economy isn't abysmal. It helps that BMW reduced the X5's curb weight by about 170 pounds with the 2014 redesign. The V8 manages EPA ratings of 14... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport |
2006 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member5416 The 3.0L i6 is rather underpowered, and it's hard for me to squeeze even 22 mpg out of my X5. Most of the time, I get close to 20. Most V8 X5s from this generation get 16-18 mpg. |
|
2003 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member5193 A gas drinker~~~ even considered its engine litre~~~ |
|
2001 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member108 Horrible mileage. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2009 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member4308 Diesel engine, 24 MPG highway, 600 miles per tank |
|
2010 BMW X5 Pros and Cons A member in California, United States like many other SUV it consume more fuel, but I know the EPA before buying the X5. |
|
2006 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member3651 |
|
2002 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member2272 It gets about 16 mpg in town and about 19-20 on the highway. For the amount of performance I should not complain but I would love a SUV that got about 30 |
|
2007 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member1322 Better than our 6 cyl Grand Cherokee by far |
|
2008 BMW X5 Pros and Cons Member1356 poor compared to diesel |
|
| |
2004 BMW X5 Pros and Cons A member in California, United States I get a consistant 16.6mpg. Mostly in town driving. |