Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
5 comments |
2016 Cadillac ATS-V Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Cadillac ATS-V's optional Recaro front seats, with adjustable seat back and cushion bolsters, provide very good support in turns. The standard seats also have adjustable seat back bolsters, but much smaller ones. Anyone who'll be using even half of the ATS-V's potential will want to pony up $2,300 for... Comparison vehicle: 2016 BMW 4-Series |
2 comments |
2015 Mercedes-Benz C400 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Mercedes-Benz C-Class's highly adjustable front seats provide proper support, but aren't especially form-fitting and aren't cushy enough to feel luxurious. But then neither are those in key competitors. One possible shortcoming, depending on the dimensions of your midsection: unlike in the BMW and the Cadillac, the side bolsters of... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Cadillac ATS |
2014 Lexus IS 350 F Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Following the Germans' lead, many car makers have been fitting firmer and firmer seats. Cadillac might have once been known for seats you could sink deep into, but those in the ATS are the opposite, with too little give and contours that are far from form-fitting. No fear, Lexus hasn't... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Cadillac ATS |
|
2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T MT6 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The front seats aren't bad, but they aren't notably good in any way, either. They could be both more comfortable and more supportive. To me, the center of the seat back felt convex rather than concave. The top two trim levels include "sport seats" with power-adjustable side bolsters and manually-adjustable... Comparison vehicle: 2012 BMW 3-Series |