| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Cadillac CTS and 2013 Chevrolet Traverse Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 118.9 in | -5.5 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 203.7 in | -12.1 in |
| Width | 72.6 in | 78.5 in | -5.9 in |
| Height | 59.1 in | 69.9 in | -10.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4031 lb. | 4646 lb. | -615 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 22.0 gal. | -4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.4 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 61.5 in | -4.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 58.0 in | -2.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.4 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 61.0 in | -4.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 57.8 in | -3.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 36.8 in | -0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.8 in | -37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 57.6 in | -57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 48.3 in | -48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 33.2 in | -33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | -33 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.0 ft3 | 24.4 ft3 | 0.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 70.3 ft3 | -45.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.0 ft3 | 116.3 ft3 | -58.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS
| 2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2013 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The second row captain's chairs are roomy and comfortable. The third row bench seat has a surprising amount of space, in particular with the 2nd row seats slid forward some. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2013 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The seats we have on our LT are fine but the headrest on both cars I've had jut out too far and cannot be adjusted back far enough to be comfortable. This is particularly uncomfortable on longer trips. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
