

Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2001 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member5508 V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better |
|
2009 Ford Ranger 4x4 with 4.0L - a real gas guzzle 2009 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member2852 2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck... |
|
2011 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member5402 Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. |
|
2003 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member4761 I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. |
|
2004 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member4576 I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2002 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons A member in California, United States I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. |
|
2006 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member1898 With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel |
|
2008 Ford Ranger Pros and Cons Member1898 Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 |