| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own "whys" and "why nots."
Honda HR-V Cargo Capacity Pros and Cons
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
|
2018 Hyundai Kona Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Due to the Hyundai's shorter rear overhang and some exceptionally creative packaging by Honda, the Kona can only hold about three-quarters as much cargo as the HR-V. To be fair, the Honda is the class outlier, and most other competitors can only hold about as much as the Hyundai. The... Comparison vehicle: 2016 Honda HR-V |
10 comments
|
2016 Mazda CX-3 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh As implied by its bobbed tail, the CX-3 also lags the segment average in cargo capacity. The Honda HR-V can fit about twice as much behind its rear seat (24 vs. 12 cubic feet), and can also hold considerably more than the Mazda with both rear seats folded (59 vs.... Comparison vehicle: 2016 Honda HR-V |
11 comments
|
2016 Honda HR-V Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Thanks to clever packaging--the fuel tank resides beneath the front seats, permitting the rear seat to fold unusually low--the Honda Fit (reviewed here) can swallow far more cargo than other cars in its class. The new HR-V shares this packaging, and consequently can hold five cubic feet more cargo... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Chevrolet Trax |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
