| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own "whys" and "why nots."
Honda Pilot Fuel Economy Pros and Cons
| Page 1 of 2 | ||
| Page 1 of 2 | ||
|
2012 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member6602 City fuel economy is lousy (average about 11 mpg), but our highway numbers are great for such a huge vehicle, particularly if we stay at 65 mph or slower. I've been able to sustain 29 mpg on a flat road at 55 mph. |
10 comments
|
2016 Honda Pilot Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Aided by cylinder deactivation while cruising, the 2015 Honda Pilot's fuel economy figures were about average in the class: 18 MPG city, 25 MPG highway with front-wheel drive (FWD) and 17/24 with all-wheel drive (AWD). For 2016, a reduction in curb weight, an updated engine, and a sixth transmission ratio... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Toyota Highlander |
|
2011 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member5712 Great fuel economy for a 7 place suv. |
|
2011 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member5712 Great fuel economy for a 7 place suv. |
|
2004 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons JasonU Great fuel economy for the size. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
|
2004 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons JasonU Great fuel economy for the size. |
|
2011 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons jrexplore When new, routinely 13L per 100 or worse, but improved after 1st oil change. Now at 10,000 Km, the gas mileage is around 11.6L per 100 in mixed driving. Gas mileage is VERY sensitive to wind direction. |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member5260 No 4 cylinder model available so city MPG < 20. |
|
2006 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member3377 0 |
|
2007 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons A member in Illinois, United States get 14 mpg around town and 27 on the road |
|
2010 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada not so good in the city excellent highway economy for a large suv. |
|
| |
|
2005 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member4476 Same fuel economy as the highlander, but with regular fuel, despite the poliot being the larger vehicle |
|
2004 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons A member in North Carolina, United States For this mid-large size SUV, getting 21-22 MPG with AWD is great |
|
2006 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member3254 Too Low |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member3211 Many of the non-Hybrid SUVs have lower fuel economy that then Pilot. I am getting close to 20 MPG on average. A significant improvement over my previous SUVs. |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member3132 could be better |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member3131 The fuel economy is decent, but there is always room for improvement. |
|
2004 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member2993 |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member1531 Not as good as I would expect: no better, than real 4x4 SUVs, such as 4Runner |
|
2008 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member2306 best in its class. Highlander gives better mileage buts its NOT a 8 seater. |
|
2007 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member2711 Averaging 18 MPG and squeezing out nearly 20 when I drive slow and easy. |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member2602 |
|
2004 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons A member in Florida, United States |
|
2007 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member1075 |
|
2007 Honda Pilot Pros and Cons Member517 |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
