| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Chevrolet Prizm vs. Mazda CX-9 Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2016 - 2018 Mazda CX-9 |
Best
122%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2010 - 2012 Mazda CX-9 |
Best
102%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2007 - 2009 Mazda CX-9 |
Best
128%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
|
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
| ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Chevrolet Prizm
| Chevrolet Prizm Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 125-horsepower 1.8L I4 3-speed automatic FWD |
The car has been rock solid for me. Very little has gone wrong with the vehicle since I bought it. full 2002 Chevrolet Prizm review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Chevrolet Prizm
| Chevrolet Prizm Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 125-horsepower 1.8L I4 3-speed automatic FWD |
The car has been rock solid for me. Very little has gone wrong with the vehicle since I bought it. full 2002 Chevrolet Prizm review |
