| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Jaguar S-Type vs. Subaru Outback Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2018 Subaru Outback |
Best
47%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
| 2015 - 2017 Subaru Outback |
Best
75%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2013 - 2014 Subaru Outback |
Best
89%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
|
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
| ||
 2010 - 2012 Subaru Outback |
Best
108%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2005 - 2009 Subaru Outback |
Best
146%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2000 - 2004 Subaru Outback |
Best
135%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Jaguar S-Type
| Jaguar S-Type Reliability And Durability: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic RWD |
Jaguar has a spotty reputation for reliablility, although I have heard that the 2003+ years are better. full 2003 Jaguar S-Type review |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 300-horsepower 4.2L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
Bad reputation for English cars. full 2003 Jaguar S-Type review |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Obviously, Jags have a reputation about reliability. Most of the thing I have fixed are wear and tear items and age. I really have not had problems that would not be normal to most cars 8-10 years old. full 2002 Jaguar S-Type review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Jaguar S-Type
| Jaguar S-Type Reliability And Durability: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic RWD |
Jaguar has a spotty reputation for reliablility, although I have heard that the 2003+ years are better. full 2003 Jaguar S-Type review |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 300-horsepower 4.2L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
Bad reputation for English cars. full 2003 Jaguar S-Type review |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Obviously, Jags have a reputation about reliability. Most of the thing I have fixed are wear and tear items and age. I really have not had problems that would not be normal to most cars 8-10 years old. full 2002 Jaguar S-Type review |
