Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
11 comments |
2016 Lexus RX 350 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The cargo floor is about the same size in all three crossovers. None excels in cargo capacity. In the Lexus, the second row doesn't fold nearly flat and the raked rear window severely cuts into cargo space above its base. In the Cadillac, there are no seat releases in the... Comparison vehicle: 2017 Cadillac XT5 |
2013 Lexus RX 350 F Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Lexus RX 350 F Sport can hold 40 cubic feet of cargo with the rear seat up, and twice as much with it folded. While cargo volume specs can be cheated, these don't appear to have been. The RX's cargo area is about the largest available for a two-row... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Cadillac SRX |
|
2005 Lexus RX Pros and Cons A member in Washington, United States RX is a nice car, but has far too little cargo space. |
|
2007 Lexus RX Pros and Cons Member968 |
|
2008 Lexus RX Pros and Cons Member3223 |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2004 Lexus RX Pros and Cons Member1188 We travel a lot and it can carry a whole lot! |