Year | Make/Model | Nada Odds per 100 Cars | Lemon Odds per 100 Cars | ||
48 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 103500 miles driven Redesigned.2009 |
Toyota Matrix | [?] | see reported repairs | ||
48 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 103500 miles driven Redesigned. |
|||||
28 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 145000 miles driven2005 | Toyota Matrix | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
28 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 145000 miles driven | |||||
27 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 174100 miles driven First year.2003 |
Toyota Matrix | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
27 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 174100 miles driven First year. |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Partly because Mitsubishi has had to rely heavily on incentives to sell outdated cars, and partly because people wonder if it'll be able to hang on much longer (if they realize it's still around at all), its brand image isn't the best. Personally, I don't expect Mitsubishi Motors to go away. If weak sales and financial losses could kill the company, or at least its American subsidiary, it would already be dead. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
20+ Years of Rally Experience, a great design team, bringing some flare to the econobox class of cars in the Nation. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual AWD |
rally race proven see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4 CVT FWD |
Face it, this is a Mitsubishi, a struggling brand with some very poor models dragging it down. This may affect resale value and as of 2012 Mitsubishi's future in the US is still uncertain. The Lancer is a great car but the overall brand is struggling. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
Toyota Matrix Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
toyota has a famous quality reputation. personally, we were disappointed with our first toyota. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2006 | 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
First - irregardless of the negative press our country have been throwing at Toyota, this manufacturer have proven themselves to be #1 in dependability and lowest CPM year after year after year. IMHO the negative is shamefully 100% BS in an effort to swing US buyers away from the so much better and time proven Asian imports. 2) Ease of entry and exit, spacious rear seating, driving fun and the performance is more than adequate, AWD is perfect for our Pacific NW winter driving, hatchback is so convenient for our needs, fold down rear seats another HUGE PLUS!, attractive styling, we're not selling but the resale is and will be excellent. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2006 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Toyota known to be one of the best car manufacturer out there. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
The movie was very exciting and full of action see full Toyota Matrix review |
2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Toyotas are well-known to be reliable and durable. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Based on the Toyota Corolla, which has a proven track record see full Toyota Matrix review |
Toyota Matrix Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Nothing. see full Toyota Matrix review |