Toyota Matrix Gas Mileage (MPG)
Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Toyota Matrix's real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.
More about the
Toyota Matrix
Toyota Matrix Gas Mileage
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 60 | 40 | 0 | N/A | 26.2 |
| flat | med | none | 0 | 50 | 45 | 5 | 70 | 27.4 | ||
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 55 | 43 | 3 | 70 | 26.8 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 0 | 55 | 43 | 3 | 70 | 26.8 | |
| With the 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 engine, 5-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2013 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
26.8 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2013 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly in the city (about 55 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (43 percent), on the highway at an average speed of 70 miles per hour (3 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2013 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 5 | 45 | 5 | 45 | 70 | 29.5 |
| flat | light | none | 5 | 45 | 5 | 45 | 70 | 29.8 | ||
| flat | light | light | 10 | 10 | 20 | 60 | 75 | 29.4 | ||
| flat | light | light | 10 | 10 | 20 | 60 | 70 | 25.3 | ||
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | light | light | 8 | 28 | 13 | 53 | 71 | 28.5 |
| Averages | flat | light | light | 8 | 28 | 13 | 53 | 71 | 28.5 | |
| With the 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 engine, 5-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2010 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
28.5 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 71 miles per hour (about 53 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (28 percent), in the suburbs (13 percent), and in heavy traffic (8 percent). In addition the average 2010 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 87 | 39.2 |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 87 | 39.2 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 87 | 39.2 | |
| With the 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2010 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
39.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 87 miles per hour (about 90 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (10 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and in the city (0 percent). In addition the average 2010 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 30 | 40 | 10 | 20 | 74 | 31.2 |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 30 | 40 | 10 | 20 | 74 | 31.2 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 30 | 40 | 10 | 20 | 74 | 31.2 | |
| With the 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2010 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
31.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly in the city (about 40 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (30 percent), on the highway at an average speed of 74 miles per hour (20 percent), and in the suburbs (10 percent). In addition the average 2010 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | med | hvy | 25 | 10 | 15 | 50 | 65 | 23.3 |
| flat | med | hvy | 25 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 65 | 30.0 | ||
| flat | light | light | 20 | 20 | 10 | 50 | 65 | 29.0 | ||
| flat | med | hvy | 10 | 20 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 25.5 | ||
| flat | light | none | 10 | 20 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 24.0 | ||
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
flat | med | light | 18 | 14 | 13 | 55 | 63 | 26.4 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 18 | 14 | 13 | 55 | 63 | 26.4 | |
| With the 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 engine, 5-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2009 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
26.4 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2009 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 63 miles per hour (about 55 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (18 percent), in the city (14 percent), and in the suburbs (13 percent). In addition the average 2009 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 21.3 |
| flat | med | none | 9 | 14 | 23 | 55 | 75 | 31.4 | ||
| flat | light | none | 35 | 10 | 5 | 50 | 62 | 26.1 | ||
| flat | med | none | 10 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 70 | 23.5 | ||
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 20 | 25 | 17 | 39 | 71 | 25.6 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 20 | 25 | 17 | 39 | 71 | 25.6 | |
| With the 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2009 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
25.6 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2009 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 71 miles per hour (about 39 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (25 percent), in heavy traffic (20 percent), and in the suburbs (17 percent). In addition the average 2009 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 20 | 75 | 62 | 26.7 |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 20 | 75 | 62 | 26.7 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 20 | 75 | 62 | 26.7 | |
| With the 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive, 2009 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
26.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2009 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 62 miles per hour (about 75 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (20 percent), in the city (5 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2009 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 81 | 23.5 |
| flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 68 | 25.7 | ||
| flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 68 | 30.2 | ||
| flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 5 | 90 | 74 | 27.4 | ||
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 1 | 4 | 95 | 73 | 26.7 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 0 | 1 | 4 | 95 | 73 | 26.7 | |
| With the 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2009 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
26.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2009 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 73 miles per hour (about 95 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (4 percent), in the city (1 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2009 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 21 | 0 | 79 | 65 | 31.7 |
| flat | light | none | 0 | 10 | 0 | 90 | 60 | 36.3 | ||
| flat | light | none | 0 | 30 | 0 | 70 | 65 | 29.1 | ||
| flat | light | none | 5 | 25 | 0 | 70 | 65 | 31.8 | ||
| flat | light | none | 5 | 30 | 0 | 65 | 65 | 34.2 | ||
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 2 | 23 | 0 | 75 | 64 | 32.6 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 2 | 23 | 0 | 75 | 64 | 32.6 | |
| With the 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2009 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
32.6 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2009 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 64 miles per hour (about 75 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (23 percent), in heavy traffic (2 percent), and in the suburbs (0 percent). In addition the average 2009 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 15 | 55 | 30 | 62 | 30.2 |
| flat | light | light | 11 | 5 | 5 | 79 | 62 | 29.6 | ||
| flat | light | none | 0 | 15 | 35 | 50 | 62 | 32.7 | ||
| hills | light | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 62 | 34.9 | ||
| flat | light | none | 5 | 15 | 30 | 50 | 62 | 33.6 | ||
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | none | 3 | 10 | 27 | 60 | 62 | 32.2 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 3 | 10 | 27 | 60 | 62 | 32.2 | |
| With the 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2007 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
32.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2007 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 62 miles per hour (about 60 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (27 percent), in the city (10 percent), and in heavy traffic (3 percent). In addition the average 2007 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 45 | 0 | 55 | 68 | 23.5 |
| flat | light | hvy | 0 | 50 | 17 | 33 | 70 | 30.0 | ||
| flat | light | none | 0 | 30 | 33 | 37 | 60 | 33.0 | ||
| flat | light | none | 5 | 25 | 40 | 30 | 60 | 26.0 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 45 | 0 | 55 | 68 | 23.5 | ||
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 1 | 39 | 18 | 42 | 65 | 27.2 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 1 | 39 | 18 | 42 | 65 | 27.2 | |
| With the 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2007 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
27.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2007 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 65 miles per hour (about 42 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (39 percent), in the suburbs (18 percent), and in heavy traffic (1 percent). In addition the average 2007 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 164-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | hvy | 0 | 10 | 25 | 65 | 65 | 29.0 |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 164-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | hvy | 0 | 10 | 25 | 65 | 65 | 29.0 |
| Averages | flat | light | hvy | 0 | 10 | 25 | 65 | 65 | 29.0 | |
| With the 164-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2006 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
29.0 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2006 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 65 miles per hour (about 65 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (25 percent), in the city (10 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2006 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC on most or all of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | 70 | 31.3 |
| flat | med | light | 0 | 2 | 2 | 96 | 65 | 35.7 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | 65 | 32.2 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 1 | 1 | 98 | 65 | 32.6 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | 65 | 29.5 | ||
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 7 | 7 | 87 | 66 | 32.3 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 0 | 7 | 7 | 87 | 66 | 32.3 | |
| With the 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2006 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
32.3 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2006 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 66 miles per hour (about 87 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (7 percent), in the suburbs (7 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2006 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 15 | 80 | 60 | 29.9 |
| flat | med | hvy | 15 | 75 | 10 | 0 | N/A | 27.4 | ||
| flat | light | hvy | 0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | 56 | 31.8 | ||
| flat | med | light | 1 | 20 | 20 | 59 | 68 | 34.1 | ||
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | light | 4 | 28 | 14 | 55 | 61 | 30.8 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 4 | 28 | 14 | 55 | 61 | 30.8 | |
| With the 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2006 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
30.8 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2006 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 61 miles per hour (about 55 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (28 percent), in the suburbs (14 percent), and in heavy traffic (4 percent). In addition the average 2006 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 26.1 |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 26.1 |
| Averages | flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 26.1 | |
| With the 118-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive, 2006 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
26.1 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2006 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 62 miles per hour (about 50 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (50 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and in the city (0 percent). In addition the average 2006 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | light | none | 5 | 10 | 10 | 75 | 65 | 34.0 |
| flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 5 | 85 | 70 | 30.0 | ||
| hills | med | light | 6 | 6 | 11 | 77 | 60 | 26.9 | ||
| flat | med | hvy | 5 | 50 | 5 | 40 | 60 | 32.0 | ||
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 4 | 19 | 8 | 69 | 64 | 30.7 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 4 | 19 | 8 | 69 | 64 | 30.7 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2005 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
30.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2005 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 64 miles per hour (about 69 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (19 percent), in the suburbs (8 percent), and in heavy traffic (4 percent). In addition the average 2005 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 23 | 0 | 77 | 62 | 32.7 |
| flat | lead | light | 30 | 10 | 10 | 50 | 74 | 29.4 | ||
| flat | light | light | 22 | 24 | 26 | 28 | 60 | 30.0 | ||
| flat | med | none | 23 | 24 | 25 | 28 | 65 | 29.0 | ||
| hills | light | none | 5 | 20 | 50 | 25 | 60 | 32.0 | ||
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 16 | 20 | 22 | 42 | 64 | 30.6 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 16 | 20 | 22 | 42 | 64 | 30.6 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2005 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
30.6 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2005 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 64 miles per hour (about 42 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (22 percent), in the city (20 percent), and in heavy traffic (16 percent). In addition the average 2005 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | hvy | 6 | 6 | 13 | 75 | 70 | 30.0 |
| flat | light | light | 10 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 60 | 26.0 | ||
| flat | light | none | 10 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 60 | 24.3 | ||
| flat | light | light | 10 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 60 | 27.7 | ||
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | light | light | 9 | 24 | 41 | 26 | 63 | 27.0 |
| Averages | flat | light | light | 9 | 24 | 41 | 26 | 63 | 27.0 | |
| With the 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive, 2005 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
27.0 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2005 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly in the suburbs (about 41 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were on the highway at an average speed of 63 miles per hour (26 percent), in the city (24 percent), and in heavy traffic (9 percent). In addition the average 2005 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 173-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 9 | 0 | 91 | 65 | 32.6 |
| flat | med | none | 0 | 6 | 0 | 94 | 65 | 32.7 | ||
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 173-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 8 | 0 | 93 | 65 | 32.7 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 0 | 8 | 0 | 93 | 65 | 32.7 | |
| With the 173-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2004 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
32.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2004 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 65 miles per hour (about 93 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (8 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and in the suburbs (0 percent). In addition the average 2004 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 10 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 70 | 31.0 |
| flat | med | none | 1 | 59 | 20 | 20 | 74 | 29.4 | ||
| flat | med | none | 1 | 59 | 20 | 20 | 74 | 29.4 | ||
| flat | light | light | 10 | 10 | 40 | 40 | 56 | 33.6 | ||
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 6 | 42 | 30 | 23 | 69 | 30.9 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 6 | 42 | 30 | 23 | 69 | 30.9 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2004 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
30.9 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2004 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly in the city (about 42 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (30 percent), on the highway at an average speed of 69 miles per hour (23 percent), and in heavy traffic (6 percent). In addition the average 2004 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 70 | 30.3 |
| flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 60 | 30.0 | ||
| flat | light | hvy | 0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | 65 | 32.9 | ||
| flat | light | hvy | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 70 | 28.9 | ||
| flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 90 | 30.4 | ||
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 71 | 30.5 |
| Averages | flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 71 | 30.5 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2004 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
30.5 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2004 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 71 miles per hour (about 93 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (7 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and in the city (0 percent). In addition the average 2004 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 10 | 10 | 10 | 70 | 75 | 30.8 |
| flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 22.0 | ||
| flat | med | hvy | 0 | 5 | 50 | 45 | 60 | 29.0 | ||
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | light | 3 | 5 | 53 | 38 | 68 | 27.3 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 3 | 5 | 53 | 38 | 68 | 27.3 | |
| With the 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2003 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
27.3 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2003 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly in the suburbs (about 53 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were on the highway at an average speed of 68 miles per hour (38 percent), in the city (5 percent), and in heavy traffic (3 percent). In addition the average 2003 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | light | 35 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 70 | 27.8 |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | light | 35 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 70 | 27.8 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 35 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 70 | 27.8 | |
| With the 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, the 2003 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
27.8 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2003 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 70 miles per hour (about 40 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (35 percent), in the city (15 percent), and in the suburbs (10 percent). In addition the average 2003 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 3 | 9 | 88 | 75 | 35.6 |
| flat | med | none | 0 | 3 | 9 | 88 | 75 | 34.6 | ||
| flat | med | none | 5 | 10 | 10 | 75 | 70 | 29.2 | ||
| flat | v.lt | light | 21 | 23 | 25 | 31 | 60 | 35.0 | ||
| flat | med | light | 0 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 65 | 28.0 | ||
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
flat | med | none | 5 | 12 | 23 | 60 | 69 | 32.5 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 5 | 12 | 23 | 60 | 69 | 32.5 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2003 Toyota Matrix gas mileage has been averaging
32.5 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2003 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 69 miles per hour (about 60 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (23 percent), in the city (12 percent), and in heavy traffic (5 percent). In addition the average 2003 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | none | 10 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 62 | 22.4 |
| flat | light | hvy | 20 | 10 | 20 | 50 | 70 | 26.7 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 60 | 27.0 | ||
| flat | med | none | 2 | 2 | 10 | 86 | 55 | 32.0 | ||
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
flat | med | light | 8 | 23 | 21 | 48 | 62 | 27.0 |
| Averages | flat | med | light | 8 | 23 | 21 | 48 | 62 | 27.0 | |
| With the 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive, 2003 Toyota Matrix fuel economy has been averaging
27.0 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2003 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 62 miles per hour (about 48 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (23 percent), in the suburbs (21 percent), and in heavy traffic (8 percent). In addition the average 2003 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
||||||||||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 29.0 |
| flat | med | none | 20 | 50 | 20 | 10 | 75 | 26.7 | ||
| flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 31.0 | ||
| flat | med | none | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 22.0 | ||
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
flat | med | none | 30 | 13 | 18 | 40 | 72 | 27.2 |
| Averages | flat | med | none | 30 | 13 | 18 | 40 | 72 | 27.2 | |
| With the 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive, the 2003 Toyota Matrix has been averaging
27.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2003 Toyota Matrixs in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 72 miles per hour (about 40 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (30 percent), in the suburbs (18 percent), and in the city (13 percent). In addition the average 2003 Toyota Matrix in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
||||||||||
If you are not a TrueDelta member, you can see only five Toyota Matrix MPG fuel economy averages for each powertrain. Log in or join us to see them all.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Toyota Matrix MPG
| Toyota Matrix Fuel Economy: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
should be good |
| 2006 | 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
We purchased our Matrix NEW June of 2006, we now (21 Dec 2012) have 82,000 miles and I have monitored the mileage since we purchased the car. We get 24 in city driving and the VERY best we've got on a long freeway drive was 30mpg. Overall our mileage for the 80,000 miles is 27 which isn't great but is acceptable. |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Front WD w/ 4sp auto, great highway mileage, but not near the advertised ratings |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Great fuel economy for a 1.8L with 30 MPG on the highway and a 500km range. |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very good 28 city 33 highway |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
With K&N air intake, we got 34mpg on freeway, and it adds 5hp to 10hp when you need to pass other cars. |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very economical on gas. |
| 2004 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Have never gotten less than 28 MPG, even when driving hard and in mountains. Usually get between 30 and 31 in the rolling country where I live. Have gotten over 34. |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Gets approx 32 miles per gallon on average |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Haul 600# of sports cargo during trips. Car does 36 mpg if speed <=60 mph, 33 mpg <=70, 30 mpg under 80 and 28 under 90 mph. |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
30 -32 mpg. what more to say. |
| 2003 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
30+mpg |
| Toyota Matrix Fuel Economy: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
good, but should be much better |
| 2008 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
It only gets about 25mpg in a mixed cycle. Fit would get 28mpg or better in same driving. |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
expected the famous corolla frugality and efficiency - it has the same powertrain. we were totally disappointed. below freezing point, fuel consumption was scary: 17-20 l/100km. the best mileage we got was only 10 l/100 km. |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Not even close to what is advertised |
