

Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
6 comments |
2018 Honda Accord Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Nothing distinguishes the new Honda Accord and Toyota Camry more from one another than their driving positions. Back in the 1980s Honda was known for ultra-low instrument panels and huge windows. That Honda is long gone and apparently isn't coming back. The latest Accord has an even lower... Comparison vehicle: 2018 Toyota Camry |
2000 Subaru Outback Pros and Cons A member in British Columbia, Canada Seat adjustability works quite well for me, with good leg support. This has been an issue before as I'm just over 6'2'' and feel cramped in many older and newer cars. I manage to be more comfortable than I was in my 2002 Camry, which had an overly wide seat.... Comparison vehicle: 2003 Toyota Camry |
|
2 comments |
2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Though the new Sonata's instrument panel is a little tall for my taste, good visibility in all directions boosts driver confidence. Instrument panel ergonomics are good by current standards, with controls that are easy to understand, reach, and operate. Comparison vehicle: 2015 Toyota Camry |
2015 Toyota Camry Hybrid SE Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Camry's driving position is the best of this threesome. It's easy to properly position the seat and steering wheel, and outward visibility is good in all directions. The Fusion's seating position is lower behind a deeper instrument panel. The Accord has even better outward visibility than the Camry, but... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Ford Fusion |
|
A roomy frugal hybrid 2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Nebraska, United States All seating positions are very comfortable. Drivers visibility is hampered by the width of the A and B pillars. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2013 Fusion Hybrid is way better than Camry 2013 Ford Fusion Pros and Cons REDACTED The A pillars are rather large and can restrict visibility when driving curvy roads. Comparison vehicle: 2012 Toyota Camry |
|
2012 Volkswagen Passat TDI SEL Premium Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Some midsize sedans put a higher priority on styling than on driver visibility. As a result, they're hard to see out of. The Passat, in contrast, has a relatively upright windshield and (by current standards) thin pillars, so it's easy to see out of. Comparison vehicle: 2012 Toyota Camry |
|
2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4297 excellent visisbitly |
|
2010 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in New Hampshire, United States Everything! Poor visibility to the rear. B pillars block view of oncoming traffic. Windshield rake is too steep for this driver. |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member3409 Felt like drive a big boat from the 60s |
|
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1282 |
|
| |
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1578 Plenty of zip for merging, passing, and even a little fun. |
|
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member362 Sense of sitting too low (perhaps because of driving the Tucson for some years) and too laid back |
|
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1095 Cannot see the corners of the car or anything to the rear of the car. |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1417 Large pillars lead to large blind spots, mirrors could be bigger |
|
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1031 Very difficult to see out sides and rear due to seats. Difficult for lane changes and merges |
|
2006 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States Accord is much more comfortable. |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member342 Can clearly see vehicles/objects all around. Mirrors cover the corners of the car. Easy to park. |