We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

2002 Volvo S40 Pros and Cons at TrueDelta: Nice Car. Find a good mechanic. by jhelm007

Member5595

0

Sign in or join to like this review.

Introduction

Everything that breaks on a Volvo will cost a fortune. Luckily they are relatively reliable and very sturdy.

Reviewed: 2002 Volvo V40

4dr Wagon turbocharged 160hp 1.9L I4 5-speed automatic FWD

Why the 2002 Volvo V40?

Handling

Low center of gravity. Good steering/suspension. Turbo engine. Fun car to drive even with a load of groceries in the back.

Safety & braking

Its a Volvo. Good brakes. Good ABS. Good traction control.

Cargo capacity

We have the wagon. Cargo area is nice. Wouldn't ever tow anything with this thing though.

Materials & workmanship

Well made. Sturdy.

Controls and instruments

Intuitive design for the most part. Everything is where you'd expect it.

Why Not the 2002 Volvo V40?

Reliability & durability

In general the car is well built, durable, and for the most part reliable. However, The electrical/electronic system is over-engineered, prone to failure, and expensive to repair (alternator $800!).

Dealer practices

The service department at our local dealer is incompetent and over charges egregiously.

Ride smoothness

European handling is Sweedish for feeling the bumps

Fuel economy

For a car this size. the fuel economy should be better.

Rear seat room & comfort

back seat is tiny. No wonder they discontinued it for the v50

Conclusion

I wish I had found an independent Volvo mechanic sooner. If it weren't for bad experiences with the stealership. I'd probably be happier with the V40.

Return to top

Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Return to top

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.