Ford C-MAX vs. Cadillac CTS MPG

Chart is based on 179 fuel economy reports for the Ford C-MAX and 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS.

Ford C-MAX MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2017	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	53	47	69	34.8
2015	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	24	37	21	19	66	44.4
2014	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	20	30	50	65	72.2
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	17	21	42	21	70	63.0
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	1	18	35	46	63	43.1

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford C-MAX fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2016	4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	0	0	60	40	70	22.1
2011	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	hvy	23	40	13	23	83	18.0
2010	4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	light	light	0	5	2	93	60	23.0
2010	4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	v.lt	none	0	64	3	34	70	18.2
2010	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	0	100	70	25.5
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	lead	light	10	8	39	44	62	15.3
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	light	5	5	35	55	65	13.2
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	med	hvy	11	16	21	53	71	22.6
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	3	18	42	37	57	19.8
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	32	34	24	72	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	none	4	23	42	31	70	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	light	8	25	15	53	75	22.5
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	1	6	19	74	70	23.4
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	med	light	0	0	83	17	70	19.3
2007	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	4	9	9	78	71	20.3
2007	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	mtns	lead	light	0	0	70	30	60	19.5
2006	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	hvy	15	50	0	35	70	18.4
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	light	25	10	5	60	85	21.0
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	11	11	72	80	21.3
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	5	20	50	25	100	16.8
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	20	50	23	67	19.2
2005	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	7	13	24	57	69	20.7
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	2	15	35	48	60	20.2
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	8	12	33	47	69	23.9
2004	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	30	70	67	21.2
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	7	25	24	45	66	21.9
2004	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	10	10	0	80	70	25.6
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	10	17	33	40	91	22.9

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Cadillac models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford C-MAX

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2013	The Ford C-MAX's fuel economy is at once the #1 reason most people will buy a C-MAX, but also the model's greatest shortfall. The EPA ratings are an impressive 47 mpg city, 47 highway. In real suburban driving we (and many owners) observed trip computer averages of 33 to 40, with an overall average of 35.8. Go easy on the gas and initiate braking early enough to fully recoup kinetic energy, and low to mid 40s can happen. But 47 is a stretch. There are two ways to look at this. On the one hand, the C-MAX isn't coming close to its EPA ratings. Odds are Ford will have to make an adjustment and credit past buyers for the difference, Hyundai-Kia style. (Which actually might be a reason to buy one before this happens.) On the other hand, even 36 mpg is about 8-12 miles-per-gallon better than similarly functional non-hybrid vehicles, including the related Ford Escape. Efficiency is supported by excellent, highly configurable instrumentation. I personally opted to view a tach (rare in a hybrid), driving style ratings, and average mpg. A "brake coach" lets you know after each stop what percentage of kinetic energy was regenerated. In hybrids, this has a large impact on mpg than how hard you accelerate (more on this below). The C-MAX is also offered as an "Energi" Plug-in Hybrid rated to cruise 21 miles on electricity alone. see full Ford C-MAX review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford C-MAX

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	With some care, it is not too hard to surpass the revised EPA estimates of 44 city / 39 highway. It particulary shines in city and suburban driving where you can crest 50 mpg on some short trips. In mixed driving, we match the EPA estimate of 40 MPG without paying much attention. While not as great as the Prius, this efficiency was certainly a step up for us and the difference in fuel costs over a year between the C-Max and Prius was not worth the shortcomings we found in the Prius (particularly poor handling and uncomfortable seats). see full Ford C-MAX review

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	On the down side for fuel economy, cold weather does a number on the MPG as is reported with other hybrid. On short trips (4 miles or less) on a cold start in cold weather with the heater going, expect low 20s for your MPG. This is mitigated over longer trips once the engine has warmed up, but we still get 1-3 MPG under our usual in cold weather for longer trips. see full Ford C-MAX review

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review