Ford C-MAX vs. Chevrolet Avalanche MPG

Chart is based on 179 fuel economy reports for the Ford C-MAX and 118 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Avalanche.

Ford C-MAX MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2017	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	53	47	69	34.8
2015	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	24	37	21	19	66	44.4
2014	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	20	30	50	65	72.2
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	17	21	42	21	70	63.0
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	1	18	35	46	63	43.1

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford C-MAX fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Avalanche MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2013	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	light	0	0	50	50	70	13.7
2012	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	none	0	10	55	35	75	17.0
2011	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	45	0	32	23	90	17.7
2011	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range	hills	med	light	0	0	0	100	80	18.2
2011	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD	flat	v.lt	none	0	0	43	58	100	15.4
2009	4dr SUT 310-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	none	0	10	25	65	70	17.6
2008	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	hvy	10	10	20	60	70	16.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	5	40	40	15	60	16.1
2007	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	light	4	16	24	56	65	15.6
2006	4dr SUT 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	hills	med	light	5	80	0	15	75	18.2
2006	4dr SUT 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	none	5	40	18	38	65	14.5
2005	4dr SUT 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	5	5	15	75	70	19.0
2005	4dr SUT 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	light	8	2	26	63	65	14.5
2004	4dr SUT 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	hills	light	none	0	0	7	93	80	17.3
2003	4dr SUT 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	none	21	23	25	30	80	15.5
2002	4dr SUT 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	50	30	20	60	13.2
2002	4dr SUT 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	hills	light	light	0	0	0	100	70	20.5

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet Avalanche fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Chevrolet models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford C-MAX

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2013	The Ford C-MAX's fuel economy is at once the #1 reason most people will buy a C-MAX, but also the model's greatest shortfall. The EPA ratings are an impressive 47 mpg city, 47 highway. In real suburban driving we (and many owners) observed trip computer averages of 33 to 40, with an overall average of 35.8. Go easy on the gas and initiate braking early enough to fully recoup kinetic energy, and low to mid 40s can happen. But 47 is a stretch. There are two ways to look at this. On the one hand, the C-MAX isn't coming close to its EPA ratings. Odds are Ford will have to make an adjustment and credit past buyers for the difference, Hyundai-Kia style. (Which actually might be a reason to buy one before this happens.) On the other hand, even 36 mpg is about 8-12 miles-per-gallon better than similarly functional non-hybrid vehicles, including the related Ford Escape. Efficiency is supported by excellent, highly configurable instrumentation. I personally opted to view a tach (rare in a hybrid), driving style ratings, and average mpg. A "brake coach" lets you know after each stop what percentage of kinetic energy was regenerated. In hybrids, this has a large impact on mpg than how hard you accelerate (more on this below). The C-MAX is also offered as an "Energi" Plug-in Hybrid rated to cruise 21 miles on electricity alone. see full Ford C-MAX review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford C-MAX

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	With some care, it is not too hard to surpass the revised EPA estimates of 44 city / 39 highway. It particulary shines in city and suburban driving where you can crest 50 mpg on some short trips. In mixed driving, we match the EPA estimate of 40 MPG without paying much attention. While not as great as the Prius, this efficiency was certainly a step up for us and the difference in fuel costs over a year between the C-Max and Prius was not worth the shortcomings we found in the Prius (particularly poor handling and uncomfortable seats). see full Ford C-MAX review

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	On the down side for fuel economy, cold weather does a number on the MPG as is reported with other hybrid. On short trips (4 miles or less) on a cold start in cold weather with the heater going, expect low 20s for your MPG. This is mitigated over longer trips once the engine has warmed up, but we still get 1-3 MPG under our usual in cold weather for longer trips. see full Ford C-MAX review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Avalanche

Chevrolet Avalanche Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD	0 see full Chevrolet Avalanche review
2007	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	GREAT MPG FOR MID-SIZE TRUCK. see full Chevrolet Avalanche review

Chevrolet Avalanche Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD	what fuel economy? bought it to pull a Brenderup horse trailer (3300lbs including 1 horse) that can be pulled with a 4cyl car in europe.... doing 22l/100km on flat roads with light foot. more than double combined rating ....GM unresponsive! see full Chevrolet Avalanche review
2007	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	14MPG in the city sucks. see full Chevrolet Avalanche review
2007	4dr SUT 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	It only averages around 14 to 15 in a mostly city driving environment. Was hoping the V4 mode would kick in more often to help improve the economy. see full Chevrolet Avalanche review