We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chevrolet Camaro vs. Toyota Matrix MPG

Chart is based on 147 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Camaro and 292 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Matrix.

Chevrolet Camaro MPG

Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2015 22.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2014 15.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2013 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 18.5 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 23.1 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 18.2 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 16.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 22.7 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 20.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 21.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 18.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 21.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 19.9 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 28.2 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2015 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
hills med none 5 20 35 40 75 22.3  
2014 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 10 90 0 0 0 15.8  
2013 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
hills med light 11 17 28 44 80 24.3  
2012 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med none 0 10 35 55 60 18.5  
2012 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 0 100 75 23.1  
2012 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 10 30 10 50 75 18.2  
2011 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 0 40 18 43 60 16.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat lead light 0 2 36 62 77 22.7  
2011 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
hills lead light 0 20 0 80 80 20.9  
2010 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 3 10 17 70 89 21.5  
2010 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 5 22 28 45 74 18.1  
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 25 14 55 62 21.6  
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 9 17 30 44 67 23.8  
2002 2dr Hatch 310-horsepower 5.7L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 4 12 43 41 72 19.9  
2002 2dr Hatch 200-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed manual RWD
hills med none 0 10 60 31 120 28.2  
2002 2dr Convertible 310-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat light light 0 35 65 0 0 22.6  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy data.

Toyota Matrix MPG

Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2013 32.2 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2013 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2012 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 28.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 39.2 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 31.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 28.5 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2008 17.3 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2007 32.1 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2007 25.1 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 29.0 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 32.1 MPG Highway Percentage 69 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 30.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 69 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 26 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 32.7 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 22 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 29.7 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.3 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 31.7 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 0 32 28 41 59 32.2  
2013 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 25 50 90 31.0  
2012 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 0 35 10 55 68 27.8  
2010 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 8 28 13 53 71 28.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
flat med light 5 5 8 82 72 20.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 0 10 90 140 39.2  
2010 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 30 40 10 20 120 31.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 18 14 13 55 63 26.4  
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med none 20 25 17 39 80 25.6  
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
flat light none 0 5 20 75 100 26.7  
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 1 4 95 118 26.7  
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 27 46 1 27 65 28.5  
2008 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat v.lt none 1 9 85 5 80 17.3  
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 13 23 53 96 32.1  
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 1 33 25 42 92 25.1  
2006 4dr Hatch 164-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 10 25 65 65 29.0  
2006 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med none 0 13 18 69 69 32.1  
2006 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 4 28 14 55 87 30.8  
2006 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
flat light none 0 0 50 50 100 26.1  
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 4 19 8 69 64 30.7  
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 13 25 22 40 79 30.7  
2005 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
flat light light 9 24 41 26 63 27.0  
2004 4dr Hatch 173-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med none 0 8 0 93 65 32.7  
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 14 40 24 22 100 29.4  
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 1 9 23 68 71 29.7  
2003 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med light 3 5 53 38 68 27.3  
2003 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 35 15 10 40 70 27.8  
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 14 23 56 69 31.7  
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 8 23 21 48 71 27.0  
2003 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
flat med none 30 13 18 40 72 27.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Matrix fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Camaro vs. Toyota Matrix MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chevrolet Camaro and Toyota Matrix's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Toyota models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Another fairly obvious "why not to buy," for either car: fuel economy. The tested Camaro scored 16 mpg city and 25 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, slightly better than the Mustang's 15/25. The automatic has an even taller top gear and when paired with it the V8 can deactivate four cylinders, so it manages 17 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--the latter figure as high as that for the Camaro V6 automatic (19/28). For significantly better fuel economy it's necessary to get the 2.0-liter turbo, which scores 21/30 with a manual and 22/31 with an automatic. In my 300-odd miles of driving I averaged 16.5 mpg. If I drove with a light foot I could coax the average slightly over 20. I observed similar real-world numbers in the Mustang. On a 70-mph highway the Camaro averaged 24.5, but there might have been a modest headwind. The Mustang averaged 28 in my highway driving. Overall, both achieve very good fuel efficiency for cars of their weight and horsepower, but praise doesn't come much fainter. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2017 2dr Coupe 455-horsepower 6.2L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Surprisingly, this 455hp car, with a 6.2L V8 -- that's 378 cubic inches -- gets decent gas mileage. It averages just over 20mpg, for which I credit the cylinder shutoff feature. So far it's been pretty common to look at the dash when I'm just beetling across town and see that it's in V4 mode, and getting 40 or 50mpg, as long as I'm keeping my right loafer rather light. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2012 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
avg 18city/22hwy see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
i am getting 25 mpg at 75 mph with a custom tune from DiabloSport. compared to the challenger srt-8 which gets 16 mpg highway! see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
great considering its at 426 HP see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Fuel economy is really great if your not mashing the gas pedal. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Matrix

Toyota Matrix Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
should be good see full Toyota Matrix review
2006 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
We purchased our Matrix NEW June of 2006, we now (21 Dec 2012) have 82,000 miles and I have monitored the mileage since we purchased the car. We get 24 in city driving and the VERY best we've got on a long freeway drive was 30mpg. Overall our mileage for the 80,000 miles is 27 which isn't great but is acceptable. see full Toyota Matrix review
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Front WD w/ 4sp auto, great highway mileage, but not near the advertised ratings see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Have never gotten less than 28 MPG, even when driving hard and in mountains. Usually get between 30 and 31 in the rolling country where I live. Have gotten over 34. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Very economical on gas. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Great fuel economy for a 1.8L with 30 MPG on the highway and a 500km range. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
With K&N air intake, we got 34mpg on freeway, and it adds 5hp to 10hp when you need to pass other cars. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Very good 28 city 33 highway see full Toyota Matrix review
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Haul 600# of sports cargo during trips. Car does 36 mpg if speed <=60 mph, 33 mpg <=70, 30 mpg under 80 and 28 under 90 mph. see full Toyota Matrix review
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Gets approx 32 miles per gallon on average see full Toyota Matrix review
Toyota Matrix Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
good, but should be much better see full Toyota Matrix review
2008 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD
It only gets about 25mpg in a mixed cycle. Fit would get 28mpg or better in same driving. see full Toyota Matrix review
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
expected the famous corolla frugality and efficiency - it has the same powertrain. we were totally disappointed. below freezing point, fuel consumption was scary: 17-20 l/100km. the best mileage we got was only 10 l/100 km. see full Toyota Matrix review
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Not even close to what is advertised see full Toyota Matrix review