TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year
Comment
2014
Both cars have comfortable front seats, but the ELR's provide more lateral support, at least with the $2,450 brown interior option (which adds power adjusters to their modestly sized side bolsters).
Front seat access isn't among the ELR's strengths. As is often the case with coupes, the doors are long and heavy.
see full review
2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Comment
The Volt's rear seat is pretty tight. The Cadillac ELR's is even tighter. At 5-9, I barely have enough space for my head and knees, and this when sitting behind someone my own size. Put someone taller in the front seat, and even pre-teens will have trouble squeezing into the back seat. This being a two-door, rear seat access is also dicey.
The Tesla's rear seat is far roomier than either GM car's. Plus a rear-facing third row is optional.
see full review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Acura MDX
2011 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2012
4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura.
see full Acura MDX review