Mercury Milan vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 88 fuel economy reports for the Mercury Milan and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Mercury Milan MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2010	4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	light	3	16	19	63	73	25.0
2010	4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	6	10	42	42	66	31.1
2009	4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	hills	med	none	6	5	10	80	65	25.3
2009	4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic AWD	hills	light	light	5	80	10	5	65	18.0
2009	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	hills	med	hvy	6	20	38	36	70	26.1
2008	4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	8	13	5	75	65	36.4
2008	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	hvy	10	15	5	70	80	28.5
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	3	35	7	55	64	23.3
2007	4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	18	20	35	28	68	22.5
2007	4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic AWD	hills	med	hvy	0	25	0	75	75	21.0
2007	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	8	16	19	58	69	26.8
2006	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	16	34	50	66	26.8

This page shows only averages. See all the Mercury Milan fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2013	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	light	0	23	76	1	70	21.0
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	50	50	65	30.0
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	light	0	15	0	85	60	31.0
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	6	19	0	75	65	28.1
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	light	9	15	33	43	63	28.8
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	none	9	15	42	35	68	27.1
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	light	0	5	15	80	75	35.0
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual FWD	hills	lead	light	3	10	10	78	78	23.8

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models and Volkswagen models.

Mercury Milan Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	MPG up to 34 hwy, no less than 25 in heavy traffic. 17 gal tank gives you around 500 mile range between gas stations. see full Mercury Milan review
2007	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	The economy is amazing and not compromised. see full Mercury Milan review
2007	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	I can carry my family, in comfort, for long trips and still get 30mpg+. Around town driving returns 23+ mpg. This mileage is within 2-3 mpg of the smaller 2003 Focus we replaced. see full Mercury Milan review
2006	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	I have seen as high as 34.5 mpg at 57mph. see full Mercury Milan review
2006	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Avg. 25+, very goood for a car this size see full Mercury Milan review
2006	0 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	Was match competitively with similar models, see full Mercury Milan review
2006	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	We consistently get around 30 MPG - and this is computed from amount of fuel and miles travelled, not from the "trip computer." This is a darn nice-size car to deliver that kind of fuel economy. see full Mercury Milan review

Mercury Milan Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Hyundi Sonata with similar size engine and a 5-speed automatic delivers 22/32. Malibu with a 2.4 and a 6-speed delivers 22/32. Focus/Milan with a 2.3 and 5-speed auto 20/28. Initial freeway driving is consistent in the 28-30 mpg range. Competitors better. see full Mercury Milan review

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review