MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Jeep Patriot vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Chart is based on 275 fuel economy reports for the Jeep Patriot and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Jeep Patriot MPG

Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2014 24.5 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2013 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2012 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2011 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2011 26.0 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2011 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2011 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2011 24.2 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2010 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2010 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2010 30.9 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2009 22.8 MPG Highway Percentage 26 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2009 26.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2009 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2009 27.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2009 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 19.9 MPG Highway Percentage 29 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 28.2 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2008 22.4 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2007 25.2 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2007 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2007 23.9 MPG Highway Percentage 71 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2007 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Jeep Patriot Jeep Patriot 2007 25.9 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 0 45 23 32 75 24.5  
2013 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med light 12 20 10 58 72 29.5  
2012 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 hills light light 0 0 10 90 55 31.0  
2011 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
CVT AWD w/low range		 flat light light 0 0 20 80 65 22.6  
2011 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light light 20 5 10 66 85 26.0  
2011 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat light hvy 0 20 10 70 70 27.8  
2011 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light light 0 50 10 40 65 24.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011 4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 0 40 0 60 70 24.2  
2010 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 hills light none 17 19 10 54 120 23.8  
2010 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat light none 10 40 0 50 100 24.8  
2010 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 8 43 28 23 55 30.9  
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 17 39 18 26 82 22.8  
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 hills light none 1 29 23 48 93 26.3  
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 1 20 43 36 78 29.4  
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 hills med none 0 5 15 80 67 27.5  
2009 4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med hvy 5 40 5 50 70 24.3  
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
CVT AWD w/low range		 flat med light 10 26 36 29 71 19.9  
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light light 4 20 24 53 62 24.3  
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 hills med light 15 10 40 35 65 23.6  
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 3 30 18 48 64 28.2  
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 7 42 17 34 85 24.3  
2008 4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 12 12 13 65 85 22.4  
2007 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med hvy 2 49 0 49 70 25.2  
2007 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
CVT AWD w/low range		 flat light light 15 16 32 37 64 23.5  
2007 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 2 18 8 71 64 23.9  
2007 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 5 15 10 70 70 27.2  
2007 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 hills med light 5 15 55 25 60 25.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Jeep Patriot fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Jeep Patriot vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Jeep Patriot and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models and Mitsubishi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Jeep Patriot

Jeep Patriot Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 Better fuel economy than my 2009 patriot - noticeable right away. see full Jeep Patriot review
2010 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 The Patriot gets about the same amount of fuel economy as my older Volvo s40 did despite giving me a lot more cargo room, more front seat room and what I find to be a much better stock sound system. see full Jeep Patriot review
2010 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 he Pat has a really good fuel milage. 9.5L/100km see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Good mileage i had done severals times 7.5 l/100km. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 The best in class: my average for summer is about 8 l/100 km, for winter about 11 l/100 km. my previous toyota matrix with smaller and weaker engine and not awd, was worse with fuel economy. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 It get exactly what the stickers say it will. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 Very nice for a 4x4 SUV. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 gets better mileage than my 2006 caravan and 3 mpgs less than a suv hybrid with out the outrages price tag see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 better than the 10 year old sedan traded in see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 very frugal, even when driven 4x4, even when freezing. esp. on the highway. way more fuel efficient than many 2x4 cars. way more frugal than our previous toyota matrix. see full Jeep Patriot review
Jeep Patriot Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 I hoped for better mpgs. It is a little bit under the EPA estimates, especially in the winter time. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 Even with the CVT set up to maximize economy, EPA numbers are slightly lower than where I think they should be. see full Jeep Patriot review
2008 0 Good fuel economy see full Jeep Patriot review
2008 4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 4 cylinder and a 5 speed manual, I still get lousy mileage see full Jeep Patriot review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review