Ford Ranger vs. Audi TT MPG

Chart is based on 141 fuel economy reports for the Ford Ranger and 91 fuel economy reports for the Audi TT.

Ford Ranger MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2021	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4 10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	20	0	80	100	20.5
2020	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4 10-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	10	40	50	0	0	24.5
2011	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	27	13	60	68	20.4
2010	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	10	10	10	70	100	20.4
2010	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	9	36	0	55	75	27.0
2009	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	hvy	8	48	10	35	120	13.0
2009	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	20	0	80	65	26.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	5	50	0	45	100	16.0
2008	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	10	10	10	70	65	19.0
2007	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	0	53	0	47	107	14.4
2007	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	53	47	65	17.2
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	10	16	20	54	100	19.4
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	25	35	25	15	110	12.5
2006	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	20	10	35	35	75	17.4
2005	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	50	20	30	60	16.7
2005	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	light	5	20	35	40	60	30.0
2005	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	10	60	10	20	75	15.6
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	10	20	70	55	20.0
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	light	light	0	0	5	95	65	18.0
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	0	20	10	70	75	21.1
2004	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	30	40	20	60	27.1
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	med	hvy	1	5	10	84	70	18.3
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	light	9	38	20	34	69	17.0
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	5	10	5	80	60	21.3
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	med	none	0	3	3	95	70	19.3
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	10	25	65	65	22.6
2003	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	8	8	21	64	65	24.8
2003	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	0	90	10	70	14.6
2002	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	light	0	18	0	82	74	16.7
2002	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	v.lt	none	10	10	10	70	60	22.0
2002	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 135-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	48	35	18	75	25.5
2001	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	hvy	0	0	30	70	60	18.5
2000	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	0	0	20	80	100	16.3
2000	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	100	0	0	0	0	11.4

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Ranger fuel economy data.

Audi TT MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2014	2dr Hatch turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	hills	med	none	0	0	50	50	78	32.5
2011	2dr Convertible turbocharged 265hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	none	0	0	5	95	60	30.0
2010	2dr Hatch turbocharged 265hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	light	3	7	12	78	62	28.2
2010	2dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	hills	med	hvy	0	0	25	75	60	28.7
2009	2dr Hatch turbocharged 265hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	none	1	9	70	21	70	23.8
2009	2dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	none	11	8	32	49	66	31.2
2009	2dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	hills	med	light	0	30	0	70	65	26.2
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed manual AWD	flat	med	hvy	7	7	43	43	70	24.4
2009	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	light	1	10	43	47	73	24.8
2009	2dr Convertible turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	light	30	30	20	20	70	24.0
2008	2dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	light	15	32	50	3	65	29.7
2008	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed manual AWD	flat	med	light	0	11	20	70	73	22.3
2008	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	hills	med	none	22	10	23	45	72	25.3
2008	2dr Convertible 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	none	11	4	17	68	70	23.4
2006	2dr Hatch turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	med	none	0	25	25	50	75	26.6
2005	2dr Hatch turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	light	hvy	20	30	10	40	80	43.5
2005	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	light	3	10	38	50	63	24.4
2004	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	med	none	10	75	5	10	125	26.6
2004	2dr Convertible turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	hills	med	light	15	26	20	41	68	28.8
2004	2dr Convertible 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	flat	light	none	15	25	60	0	N/A	20.5
2003	2dr Hatch turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	lead	light	5	10	10	75	70	27.8
2003	2dr Hatch turbocharged 180hp 1.8L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	hills	med	hvy	17	27	23	33	68	28.2
2003	2dr Convertible turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	lead	hvy	28	20	23	30	68	26.9
2002	2dr Hatch turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	med	none	14	33	12	41	68	26.6
2002	2dr Hatch turbocharged 180hp 1.8L I4 5-speed manual AWD	hills	med	light	13	63	13	13	70	24.0
2002	2dr Convertible turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	flat	med	none	5	40	0	55	70	26.7
2001	2dr Hatch turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	hills	light	none	20	47	0	33	60	25.5

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Audi TT fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Audi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. see full Ford Ranger review
2009	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck with a V8 and more features and by this time I'm sure that I could have broken even if you consider how much the Ranger has cost me in additional fuel costs. Although I'm confident that this little Ranger will last for years, I'm afraid that I will be trading it earlier than I would have wanted to find something that is not such a gas guzzler. see full Ford Ranger review
2008	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 see full Ford Ranger review
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel see full Ford Ranger review
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 see full Ford Ranger review
2003	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual RWD	V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Audi TT

Audi TT Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	2dr Convertible turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	Outstanding and a complete surprise considering the heavy right foot see full Audi TT review
2009	2dr Hatch turbocharged 265hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD	0-60 in 5sec and 30mpg hwy the turbo 4 give great balance between power and economy. see full Audi TT review
2008	2dr Hatch 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual AWD	28-30 mpg highway driving. see full Audi TT review
2003	2dr Hatch turbocharged 180hp 1.8L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	The VW 1.8 turbo motor is very efficient when not bombing along under boost. Maintains 32mpg hwy consistently here in flat Florida. see full Audi TT review
2003	2dr Convertible turbocharged 225hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual AWD	pretty solid for a sports car... 25 mpg (with a lead foot) see full Audi TT review