Ford Ranger vs. Cadillac CTS MPG

Chart is based on 141 fuel economy reports for the Ford Ranger and 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS.

Ford Ranger MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2021	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4 10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	20	0	80	100	20.5
2020	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4 10-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	10	40	50	0	0	24.5
2011	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	27	13	60	68	20.4
2010	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	10	10	10	70	100	20.4
2010	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	9	36	0	55	75	27.0
2009	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	hvy	8	48	10	35	120	13.0
2009	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	20	0	80	65	26.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	5	50	0	45	100	16.0
2008	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	10	10	10	70	65	19.0
2007	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	0	53	0	47	107	14.4
2007	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	53	47	65	17.2
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	10	16	20	54	100	19.4
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	25	35	25	15	110	12.5
2006	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	20	10	35	35	75	17.4
2005	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	50	20	30	60	16.7
2005	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	light	5	20	35	40	60	30.0
2005	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	10	60	10	20	75	15.6
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	10	20	70	55	20.0
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	light	light	0	0	5	95	65	18.0
2004	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	0	20	10	70	75	21.1
2004	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	30	40	20	60	27.1
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	med	hvy	1	5	10	84	70	18.3
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	light	9	38	20	34	69	17.0
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	5	10	5	80	60	21.3
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	hills	med	none	0	3	3	95	70	19.3
2003	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	10	25	65	65	22.6
2003	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	8	8	21	64	65	24.8
2003	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	0	0	90	10	70	14.6
2002	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	light	0	18	0	82	74	16.7
2002	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	v.lt	none	10	10	10	70	60	22.0
2002	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 135-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	48	35	18	75	25.5
2001	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	hvy	0	0	30	70	60	18.5
2000	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	0	0	20	80	100	16.3
2000	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	none	100	0	0	0	0	11.4

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Ranger fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2016	4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	0	0	60	40	70	22.1
2011	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	hvy	23	40	13	23	83	18.0
2010	4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	light	light	0	5	2	93	60	23.0
2010	4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	v.lt	none	0	64	3	34	70	18.2
2010	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	0	100	70	25.5
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	lead	light	10	8	39	44	62	15.3
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	light	5	5	35	55	65	13.2
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	med	hvy	11	16	21	53	71	22.6
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	3	18	42	37	57	19.8
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	32	34	24	72	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	none	4	23	42	31	70	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	light	8	25	15	53	75	22.5
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	1	6	19	74	70	23.4
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	med	light	0	0	83	17	70	19.3
2007	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	4	9	9	78	71	20.3
2007	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	mtns	lead	light	0	0	70	30	60	19.5
2006	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	hvy	15	50	0	35	70	18.4
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	light	25	10	5	60	85	21.0
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	11	11	72	80	21.3
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	5	20	50	25	100	16.8
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	20	50	23	67	19.2
2005	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	7	13	24	57	69	20.7
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	2	15	35	48	60	20.2
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	8	12	33	47	69	23.9
2004	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	30	70	67	21.2
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	7	25	24	45	66	21.9
2004	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	10	10	0	80	70	25.6
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	10	17	33	40	91	22.9

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Cadillac models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. see full Ford Ranger review
2009	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck with a V8 and more features and by this time I'm sure that I could have broken even if you consider how much the Ranger has cost me in additional fuel costs. Although I'm confident that this little Ranger will last for years, I'm afraid that I will be trading it earlier than I would have wanted to find something that is not such a gas guzzler. see full Ford Ranger review
2008	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 see full Ford Ranger review
2006	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel see full Ford Ranger review
2004	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 see full Ford Ranger review
2003	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual RWD	V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review