MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Honda Ridgeline vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 275 fuel economy reports for the Honda Ridgeline and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Honda Ridgeline MPG

Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2019 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2017 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2014 18.2 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2011 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2010 17.9 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2009 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2008 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2007 17.2 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2006 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 71 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2019 4dr SUT 280-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 0 0 100 75 27.0  
2017 4dr SUT 280-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat light light 1 14 3 82 65 21.3  
2014 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 hills med none 5 10 10 75 60 18.2  
2011 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 mtns med light 28 31 0 41 75 17.0  
2010 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 flat med none 4 16 37 43 70 17.9  
2009 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 flat med light 5 11 11 74 79 20.3  
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 11 41 48 71 17.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 flat light none 9 9 39 43 67 17.2  
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 flat med light 6 9 14 71 68 20.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda Ridgeline fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 35.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 21.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 30.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 31.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 28.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 28.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 27.1  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 35.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 23.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Honda Ridgeline vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Honda Ridgeline and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models and Volkswagen models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Honda Ridgeline

Honda Ridgeline Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 17-18 around town, 20+ on the highway on regular fuel. see full Honda Ridgeline review
Honda Ridgeline Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 Like many have said, should get better gas mileage for its smaller size. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2009 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 Should get better mileage for a smaller truck. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 16-18 MPG from a Honda is dismal. I averaged 20 MPG in my 2004 4x4 Ranger super cab. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 My records show the published manufacturer figures are excellent but competators seem to be doing a bit better see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 It does not have a fuel advantage for being a unit body. I am getting only a 1 mpg combined city/highway economy improvment over my Dodge Ram 3500 Megacab Diesel 4x4(which has been sold to buy this Honda.) see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 I typically get 18 mpg in suburban driving, and 22 mpg at a steady highway cruise. Not awful, but I would like better mileage from a 3.5L V-6. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 13-15mpg around town. 18mpg on the road. Knew this going in though and I still LOVE this truck! see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 The fuel economy is no better than other V6 trucks, and barely better than some V8 trucks. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 I would like to be 20+ mpg but in this category the Ridgeline is a "clunker" at about 15-18 mpg. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD		 i expected better- i get 17-18 over all. with a 1500 4wd chevy w/5.3 liter i got the same or better with much more power. see full Honda Ridgeline review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review