We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. Ford Explorer Sport Trac MPG

Chart is based on 18 fuel economy reports for the Mercedes-Benz SLK and 28 fuel economy reports for the Ford Explorer Sport Trac.

Mercedes-Benz SLK MPG

Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2009 21.8 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2009 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2008 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2007 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2006 23.4 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2006 24.7 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2005 23.2 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2005 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2003 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 79 percent Mercedes-Benz SLK Mercedes-Benz SLK 2001 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. 355-horsepower 5.4L V8
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 0 10 20 70 100 21.8  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. 300-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 0 5 45 50 65 21.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
mtns lead light 5 5 10 80 75 25.5  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 228-horsepower 3.0L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 13 13 8 68 95 25.6  
2006 2dr Hardtop conv. 355-horsepower 5.4L V8
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 2 10 3 85 70 23.4  
2006 2dr Hardtop conv. 228-horsepower 3.0L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 10 10 20 60 70 24.7  
2005 2dr Hardtop conv. 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 10 25 12 53 66 23.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2005 2dr Hardtop conv. 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat lead none 0 0 10 90 75 24.0  
2003 2dr Hardtop conv. supercharged 192hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 0 5 16 79 72 26.2  
2001 2dr Hardtop conv. 215-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 1 15 35 50 63 25.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mercedes-Benz SLK fuel economy data.

Ford Explorer Sport Trac MPG

Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2010 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2008 14.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2008 14.4 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 18.9 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 16.5 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 17.8 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2005 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2004 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2004 17.9 MPG Highway Percentage 94 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2003 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2001 14.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2010 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 0 25 28 48 70 16.7  
2008 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med light 2 2 50 47 58 14.2  
2008 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 5 10 65 20 68 14.4  
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 0 15 60 25 60 18.9  
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 10 20 23 47 63 16.5  
2007 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 3 53 35 10 60 17.8  
2005 4dr SUT 205-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 0 0 20 80 70 16.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2004 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat lead light 10 30 20 40 75 20.0  
2004 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 0 0 6 94 67 17.9  
2003 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 5 30 38 28 68 17.0  
2001 4dr SUT 203-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 0 10 55 35 60 14.1  

Return to top

Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. Ford Explorer Sport Trac MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mercedes-Benz SLK and Ford Explorer Sport Trac's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mercedes-Benz SLK

Mercedes-Benz SLK Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 2dr Hardtop conv. 355-horsepower 5.4L V8
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
clearly AMG was not thinking gas mileage at all when they built this engine see full Mercedes-Benz SLK review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Explorer Sport Trac

Ford Explorer Sport Trac Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
99 Dodge Durango with 5.9 V8 got better fuel economy with same driving habits. Expected better with smaller V8 and 6 speed trans. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2008 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Terrible. I've owned fullsize pickups and SUV so I know what to expect. I've never seen the average mpg display read over 15mpg for the six months I've owned it. The main reason I bought this was the combination AWD and 4WD transfer case, but it doesn't have a 2 wheel drive position like my Sierra did. Boy do I miss that, I averaged 20 mpg per tank. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
highway mileage is very good, better than my lighter V6 Ranger; 21mpg on the highway @ 75mph on flat road. City, with the remote start in winter, with the AWD kicking in, and lead foot acceleration nets me 13mpg. A light foot can get 15mpg city see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2002 4dr SUT 203-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I think we all wish for 30 mpd-thats unrealistic when you have 10000+ lbs on the road when towing. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review