MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chrysler Sebring vs. Toyota Matrix MPG

Chart is based on 59 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler Sebring and 292 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Matrix.

Chrysler Sebring MPG

Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2010 23.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2009 33.7 MPG Highway Percentage 71 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2008 28.0 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2008 23.0 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2008 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2008 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2006 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2005 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 81 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2004 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2004 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2003 22.2 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2002 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2002 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2002 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 79 percent Chrysler Sebring Chrysler Sebring 2000 18.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2010 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 10 10 30 50 60 23.3  
2009 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 0 29 71 60 33.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 0 0 38 62 72 28.0  
2008 2dr Convertible 235-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 10 20 10 60 70 23.0  
2008 2dr Convertible 189-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 5 23 5 68 68 27.1  
2008 2dr Convertible 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 5 0 5 90 70 11.4  
2006 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 hills light light 0 10 40 50 65 27.8  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2005 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 hills med light 4 9 6 81 76 28.4  
2004 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 5 75 20 60 20.5  
2004 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 hills lead light 10 10 20 60 75 21.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 3 10 28 60 90 22.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 142-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 0 0 100 100 29.4  
2002 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 2 51 30 17 60 24.3  
2002 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 2 3 17 79 65 29.1  
2000 2dr Convertible 163-horsepower 2.5L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 hills light light 20 21 24 35 60 18.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler Sebring fuel economy data.

Toyota Matrix MPG

Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2013 32.2 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2013 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2012 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 28.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 39.2 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2010 31.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2009 28.5 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2008 17.3 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2007 32.1 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2007 25.1 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 29.0 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 32.1 MPG Highway Percentage 69 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 30.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2006 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 69 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2005 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 26 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 32.7 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 22 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2004 29.7 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.3 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 31.7 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Toyota Matrix Toyota Matrix 2003 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 32 28 41 59 32.2  
2013 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 25 50 90 31.0  
2012 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 35 10 55 68 27.8  
2010 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 8 28 13 53 71 28.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 flat med light 5 5 8 82 72 20.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 0 10 90 140 39.2  
2010 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 30 40 10 20 120 31.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 18 14 13 55 63 26.4  
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 20 25 17 39 80 25.6  
2009 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 5 20 75 100 26.7  
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 1 4 95 118 26.7  
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 27 46 1 27 65 28.5  
2008 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat v.lt none 1 9 85 5 80 17.3  
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 10 13 23 53 96 32.1  
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 1 33 25 42 92 25.1  
2006 4dr Hatch 164-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 0 10 25 65 65 29.0  
2006 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 0 13 18 69 69 32.1  
2006 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 4 28 14 55 87 30.8  
2006 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 100 26.1  
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 4 19 8 69 64 30.7  
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 13 25 22 40 79 30.7  
2005 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 flat light light 9 24 41 26 63 27.0  
2004 4dr Hatch 173-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 0 8 0 93 65 32.7  
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 14 40 24 22 100 29.4  
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 1 9 23 68 71 29.7  
2003 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 3 5 53 38 68 27.3  
2003 4dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 35 15 10 40 70 27.8  
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 14 23 56 69 31.7  
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 8 23 21 48 71 27.0  
2003 4dr Hatch 123-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 flat med none 30 13 18 40 72 27.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Matrix fuel economy data.

Chrysler Sebring vs. Toyota Matrix MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chrysler Sebring and Toyota Matrix's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models and Toyota models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chrysler Sebring

Chrysler Sebring Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Excellent mileage for a car that will hold four with lots of room, about 30-34 mpg at freeway speeds. The 4 cylinder engine is not a hot rod but gets up to highway speed without making me feel nervous about merging. see full Chrysler Sebring review
2006 4dr Sedan 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 I get great fuel economy. Recently took it on a 700 km trip, and used on tank (60 litres!) see full Chrysler Sebring review
2005 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 The car typically got about 30 MPG on long business trips. see full Chrysler Sebring review
Chrysler Sebring Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 This car guzzles gas like it's going out of style. Absolutely terrible in terms of fuel economy. My Dodge Journey with a 3.6L V6 is by far better on gas! see full Chrysler Sebring review
2007 4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 I wish it could be better, but I asked for the 3.5L and I got the 3.5L. see full Chrysler Sebring review
2004 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 very poor gas milage during city driving - tank is very big - $20.00 from empty barely moves the needle. see full Chrysler Sebring review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Matrix

Toyota Matrix Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 should be good see full Toyota Matrix review
2006 4dr Hatch 118-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic AWD		 We purchased our Matrix NEW June of 2006, we now (21 Dec 2012) have 82,000 miles and I have monitored the mileage since we purchased the car. We get 24 in city driving and the VERY best we've got on a long freeway drive was 30mpg. Overall our mileage for the 80,000 miles is 27 which isn't great but is acceptable. see full Toyota Matrix review
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Front WD w/ 4sp auto, great highway mileage, but not near the advertised ratings see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Have never gotten less than 28 MPG, even when driving hard and in mountains. Usually get between 30 and 31 in the rolling country where I live. Have gotten over 34. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Very economical on gas. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Great fuel economy for a 1.8L with 30 MPG on the highway and a 500km range. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 With K&N air intake, we got 34mpg on freeway, and it adds 5hp to 10hp when you need to pass other cars. see full Toyota Matrix review
2004 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Very good 28 city 33 highway see full Toyota Matrix review
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Haul 600# of sports cargo during trips. Car does 36 mpg if speed <=60 mph, 33 mpg <=70, 30 mpg under 80 and 28 under 90 mph. see full Toyota Matrix review
2003 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Gets approx 32 miles per gallon on average see full Toyota Matrix review
Toyota Matrix Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 good, but should be much better see full Toyota Matrix review
2008 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 It only gets about 25mpg in a mixed cycle. Fit would get 28mpg or better in same driving. see full Toyota Matrix review
2007 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 expected the famous corolla frugality and efficiency - it has the same powertrain. we were totally disappointed. below freezing point, fuel consumption was scary: 17-20 l/100km. the best mileage we got was only 10 l/100 km. see full Toyota Matrix review
2005 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Not even close to what is advertised see full Toyota Matrix review