Acura MDX Acura MDX 2014 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 2017

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Acura MDX (2014) vs. Mazda CX-3 (2017) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Acura MDX and 2017 Mazda CX-3 specs.

2014 Acura MDX and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications

Model Year 2014 2017  
Model Acura MDX Mazda CX-3  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 111.0 in 101.2 in 9.8 in
Length 193.6 in 168.3 in 25.3 in
Width 77.2 in 69.6 in 7.6 in
Height 66.7 in 60.7 in 6 in
Curb Weight 4025 lb. 2809 lb. 1216 lb.
Fuel Capacity 19.5 gal. 12.7 gal. 6.8 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 38.1 in 38.4 in -0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 61.1 in 53.5 in 7.6 in
Hip Room, Row 1 57.5 in 52.3 in 5.2 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.4 in 41.7 in -0.3 in
Headroom, Row 2 38.3 in 37.2 in 1.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 59.1 in 50.4 in 8.7 in
Hip Room, Row 2 57.8 in 49.0 in 8.8 in
Legroom, Row 2 36.6 in 35.0 in 1.6 in
Headroom, Row 3 35.6 in 0.0 in 35.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 3 54.7 in 0.0 in 54.7 in
Hip Room, Row 3 40.6 in 0.0 in 40.6 in
Legroom, Row 3 28.1 in 0.0 in 28.1 in
Total Legroom 106.1 in (over 3 rows) 76.7 in (over 2 rows) 29.4 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 14.8 ft3 12.4 ft3 2.4 ft3
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 38.4 ft3 12.4 26 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 68.4 ft3 44.5 ft3 23.9 ft3

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Acura MDX

2014 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others. By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable. The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan. see full Acura MDX review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Acura MDX

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Acura MDX.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2016 The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review
2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.